State Ex Rel. Bohon v. Feldstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we saw “no reason to extend the definition of nuisance[,]” and determining that any recovery was limited to a theory of negligence
• explaining that it is a nuisance per se if “the thing itself’ works “some unlawful peril to health or safety of person or property.” (quoting Sherwood Bros., Inc. v. Eckard, 204 Md. 485, 494, 105 A.2d 207, 211 (1954))
• allegation that landlord “should have known” of improper installation of water heater insufficient to state cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).