Skip to main content
· 4/24/1978

State ex rel. Bliss v. Mason

Citations

  • 33 Or. App. 619
  • 577 P.2d 544
  • 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 3397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing summary judgment of ratification for carrier and remanding for jury trial where it was not clear that clerical office employees in fact knew or understood that there had been a breach when the checks were deposited
  • reversing summary judgment of ratification for carrier and remanding for jury trial where it was not clear that clerical office employees in fact knew or understood that there had been a breach when the checks were deposited
  • “We do not agree that plaintiff’s legal right to sue... constituted a sufficient benefit to plaintiff that plaintiff should be considered to have ratified defendant’s actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buttler, Schwab, Tanzer, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.