Skip to main content
· 3/22/1918

State ex rel. Berger v. Haiman

Citations

  • 100 Wash. 632
  • 171 P. 529
  • 1918 Wash. LEXIS 775

Syllabus

<p>Action-—Jurisdiction—Defect of Parties. Where the court has jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action and of the parties before it, its jurisdiction cannot he assailed because a corporation, which had not been joined, was a necessary party to the action.</p> <p>Contempt—Violation of Injunction—Changed Conditions—Effect. After parties are enjoined from participating in the affairs of a corporation because they were not members, they cannot evade the injunction by proceeding to have themselves elected as members; hut it was their duty to show such a changed relation and apply for a modification of the decree, in order to avoid being guilty of contempt in violating the injunction.</p>

Judges: Chadwick, Ellis, Holcomb, Mount

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.