State ex rel. Benton v. Thompson
Citations
- 106 La. 395
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>The Supreme Court will not mandamus a district judge to proceed to the taxing of the costs incurred by a succession, where, after hearing of parties upon a rule, it has been made to appear to him that the executrix of the succession has been removed from office, and no successor has yet been appointed contradictorily with whom the question of costs could be liquidated, and where the relators are not the parties to whom the costs are due, hut universal legatees not jet ordered to be placed in possession.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s argument “that the definition of Global Fleets does not accord with commercial reality, given that [defendants do not] use the FTC’s definition of that term... .”
- rejecting defendant’s argument “that the definition of Global Fleets does not accord with commercial reality, given that [defendants do not] use the FTC’s definition of that term... .”
- internal document noted that if merger closed, it would “increase our ability to charge far better prices”
- “The fact that the merging parties have been able to maintain high margins and market shares without witnessing notable entry and expansion suggests that... the market... is characterized by significant barriers to entry.” (cleaned up)
- market of customers with fleets of 10 or more global maritime vessels
- market of customers with fleets of 10 or more global maritime vessels
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nicholls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.