State Ex Rel. Bean v. Hardy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a “change in language is presumed to be a change in form only unless it is clearly shown that the Legislature intended to change the meaning of the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-01· cited 106×
• State v. Garcia
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-06-18· cited 38×
• ARIZONA NEWSPAPERS ASS'N. v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-16· cited 28×
• State v. Govorko
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-04-03· cited 16×
• Gamez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-08-10· cited 13×
• State v. Ware
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-10-05· cited 8×
• Starr Pass Resort Devs., LLC v. Harrington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-10-10

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. McNabb
  California Supreme Court· 1935-04-30· cited 60×
• In Re Quinn
  California Supreme Court· 1945-01-23· cited 33×
• Peterson v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1940-11-12· cited 30×
• People v. Jones
  California Supreme Court· 1936-06-22· cited 24×
• Melendez v. Johns
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1938-03-07· cited 21×
• State of Arizona v. Glenn
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1942-11-16· cited 16×
• Waara v. Golden Turkey Mining Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1943-03-22· cited 9×