State ex rel. Barret v. Shea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that scienter was not an element of a statute prohibiting the possession of gambling devices
• where statute clearly does not require scienter, court may not require State to prove that element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).