· 4/13/1976
State Ex Rel. Babbitt v. Arnold
Citations
- 548 P.2d 426
- 26 Ariz. App. 333
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 844
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that county may assert privilege
- holding that county may assert privilege
- holding that county may assert privilege
- trial court may conduct in camera review of privileged materials
- “[I]t is incumbent upon a trial court not to assume the facts which would give rise to a privilege, but rather, when a prima facie showing of a privilege is made, to decide whether disclosure should be required after an in camera inspection.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Krucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.