Skip to main content
· 4/13/1976

State Ex Rel. Babbitt v. Arnold

Citations

  • 548 P.2d 426
  • 26 Ariz. App. 333
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that county may assert privilege
  • holding that county may assert privilege
  • holding that county may assert privilege
  • trial court may conduct in camera review of privileged materials
  • “[I]t is incumbent upon a trial court not to assume the facts which would give rise to a privilege, but rather, when a prima facie showing of a privilege is made, to decide whether disclosure should be required after an in camera inspection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Krucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.