State Ex Rel. Babbitt v. Arnold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that county may assert privilege
• holding that county may assert privilege
• holding that county may assert privilege
• trial court may conduct in camera review of privileged materials
• “[I]t is incumbent upon a trial court not to assume the facts which would give rise to a privilege, but rather, when a prima facie showing of a privilege is made, to decide whether disclosure should be required after an in camera inspection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-05-02· cited 134×
• Granger v. Wisner
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-12-17· cited 42×
• Blazek v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-02-22· cited 39×
• Christopher Matthew Clements v. Hon. bernini/state
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2020-09-09· cited 18×
• Hammerman v. Northern Trust Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-06-03· cited 6×
• Arizona Department of Economic Security v. O'Neil
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-05-11· cited 5×
• Lund v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-09-06· cited 5×
• Rene Castro v. Hon. Peter J. Hochuli C.C.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-02-06· cited 2×
• In Re: Grand Jury v.
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-05-02
• State of Arizona Ex Rel Adel v. Hon. Adleman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2022-02-09

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathews v. Pyle
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1952-12-29· cited 81×
• Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of Indiana
  Seventh Circuit· 1969-11-19· cited 50×
• City of Phoenix v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-12-18· cited 28×
• Tucson Medical Center Incorporated v. Rowles
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-03-29· cited 26×
• Jackson v. American Credit Bureau, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-02-18· cited 24×
• Charles K. Chapman v. Norman Goodman, Special Agent of the Bureau of Internal Revenue
  Ninth Circuit· 1955-04-04· cited 21×
• Cornet Stores v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR CTY. OF YAVAPAI
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-01-21· cited 20×
• Dura Corp. v. Milwaukee Hydraulic Products, Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1965-04-02· cited 9×
• Tury v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-02-06· cited 3×