State ex rel. Apling v. Apling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, during a Terry stop, the “methods employed should be the least intrusive means reasonably available” (quoting Royer, 460 U.S. at 500)
• remanding case for further factfinding, because the trial judge had failed to make findings of fact essential to decide the issue on review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).