State ex rel. Annala v. Annala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a defendant who has proceeded to trial cannot compare his sentence to sentences imposed on defendants who pled guilty
• finding that a defendant who has proceeded to trial cannot compare his sentence to sentences imposed on defendants who pled guilty
• defendant “was aware of the criminal design” of one boy meeting up in another town to fight another boy
• “[W]e are inclined to agree with the commentators and a number of our sister States who found consent not to be a defense to a battery based on injurious touching.”
• defendant “was aware of the criminal design” of one boy meeting up in another town to fight another boy
• “[A] defendant who has stood trial cannot properly compare his sentence with those imposed on persons who have pleaded guilty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).