State ex rel. Anderson v. Kerr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the district court has no discretionary authority to enlarge or extend the time in which a party is allowed to redeem

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Orr v. Sutton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1914-07-17· cited 18×
• Smitz v. Leopold
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-12-02· cited 17×
• Mollerup v. Storage Systems International
  Utah Supreme Court· 1977-09-26· cited 16×
• Moore v. Penney
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1919-01-24· cited 13×
• Petition of Nelson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-03-23· cited 12×
• In re Judicial Ditch No. 52
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1915-12-17· cited 5×
• Sieve v. Rosar
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-07-11· cited 4×
• Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-08-28

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tice v. Russell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1890-02-27· cited 19×
• Hyman v. Bogue
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1890-11-01· cited 5×
• Hoover v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1891-12-01· cited 4×