State ex rel. Anderson v. Chambers-Smith
Citations
- 198 N.E.3d 97
- 168 Ohio St. 3d 283
- 2022 Ohio 2844
Syllabus
Mandamus—Appellant's complaint to compel Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction to correct records pertaining to him failed to identify any error within the records themselves—Court of appeals also did not err in concluding that appellant has no clear right to be released under R.C. 2967.15(B)—Court of appeals' denial of writ affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although defendant asserted that unpreserved claim, which was based on new rule announced while case was pending, was reviewable under both Golding and Evans standards, court reviewed claim under Golding without addressing Evans
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.