State Ex Rel. Amanda M. v. JUSTIN T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court was not required to make specific finding as to best interests in creating parenting plan under Parenting Act
• specific finding not required in creating parenting plan under Parenting Act
• specific finding not required in creating parenting plan under Parenting Act
• in paternity case, it is preferable to make express finding that order of joint custody is in best interests of child, but it is \not error under the Parenting Act in a paternity case to fail to make a specific finding of best interests\
• in paternity case, it is preferable to make express finding that order of joint custody is in best interests of child, but it is “not error under the Parenting Act in a paternity case to fail to make a specific finding of best interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).