Skip to main content
· 7/1/1902

State ex rel. Alexis v. Gaudet

Citations

  • 108 La. 601

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>An application for an injunction against executory process, based on the prescription of the debt to satisfy which the executory process has issued, should not be refused where the debt on the face of the proceedings is prescribed.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] caller seeking 22 out a consumer’s express written consent to send subsequent telemarketing or advertising 23 texts is not as a matter of law already engaged in telemarketing.”
  • “[D]istrict courts consider ‘documents that are attached to the complaint or incorporated in it by reference because such documents are deemed part of the pleading.’” (quoting Roth v. Jennings, 489 F.3d 499, 509 (2d Cir. 2007)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.