State ex rel. Alexander v. Duplantier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an order summarily denying a defendant’s rule 3.850 motion under the “tipsy coachman” doctrine because the trial court properly denied relief, though not for the correct reason
• affirming an order summarily denying a defendant’s rule 3.850 motion under the “tipsy coachman” doctrine because the trial court properly denied relief, though not for the correct reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).