STATE, DEPT. OF TAXATION v. DaimlerChrysler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “omissions of subject matters from statutory provisions are presumed to have been intentional”
• stating that subject matter omitted from a statute is deemed intentional
• \[O]missions of subject matters from statutory provisions are presumed to have been intentional.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).