Skip to main content
· 11/21/2008

STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Young

Citations

  • 995 So. 2d 1080
  • 2008 WL 4949303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where father’s letter and motion did not comply with section 742.18(1), the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in treating them as a petition for disestablishment under the statute and ordering scientific tests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.