STATE, DEPT. OF LAW v. Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judicial estoppel precluded defendant from changing testimony at a license revocation hearing from that given in a criminal proceeding where defendant pleaded guilty
• stating that judicial estoppel \bars a party to a legal proceeding from arguing a position inconsistent with one previously asserted\
• holding that \a judgment of conviction may not be collaterally attacked in an employee license revocation proceeding\ because it undercut the Casino Control Act's 15 strong policy of maintaining the integrity of the casino industry
• stating that at the very heart of this public policy is the confidence and trust of the public in the credibility and integrity of the regulatory process and casino operations
• stating that at the very heart of this public policy is the confidence and trust of the public in the credibility and integrity of the regulatory process and casino operations
• “[T]he doctrine of judicial estoppel ... ‘bar(s) a party to a legal proceeding from arguing a position inconsistent with one previously asserted.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).