State, Dept. of Ins. v. Ins. Services Office

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declaring that Legislature's consideration of, and refusal to enact, proposed legislation is \strong evidence\ that agency was not authorized to promulgate rules doing what the Legislature refused to do
• noting that an agency’s rule may not “extend, modify, or conflict” with state law
• rulemaking cannot be used to make legal that which there is no authority to do in the first place

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).