Skip to main content
· 6/25/1997

State, Dept. of Human Resources v. Shinall

Citations

  • 941 P.2d 616
  • 148 Or. App. 560
  • 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to let a party circumvent the res judicata effect of a prior final judgment
  • the “no longer equitable” provision in ORCP 71 B(1)(e) codifies the common law rule “that a judgment with prospective operation may be subject to change based upon changed conditions” (internal quo- tation marks omitted)
  • the “no longer equitable” provision in ORCP 71 B(1)(e) codifies the common law rule “that a judg- ment with prospective operation may be subject to change based upon changed conditions” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Hasel-Ton, De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.