State, Department of Transportation v. Haas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that competent, substantial evidence must support costs awarded
• stating that competent, substantial evidence must support costs awarded
• explaining that “it is clear that under White, a court may only properly consider those costs that were already taxable on the date the PFS was filed,” and holding that the experts’ costs were not taxable because they had not been deposed and did not testify
• “[I]t is clear that taxable costs for experts do not include costs for those experts who do not testify. Therefore, costs for non- testifying experts are nontaxable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).