State, Department of Transportation & Development v. SDS, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that oral sex in the city jail's \drunk tank\ occurred in a public place where jail staff, other inmates, and people on public tours could view the act
• concluding that oral sex in the city jail’s “drunk tank” occurred in a public place where jail staff, other inmates, and people on public tours could view the act
• holding that “drunk tank” was public place for purposes of public sexual indecency statute because of the possibility of being observed by persons on an occasional tour of the jail, frequent visitors to inmates, and the other inmates present
• interpreting Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-1811 (1976) to find jail’s “drunk tank” is a public place
• \drunk tank\ of city jail, wherein jailer observed defendant allegedly engaging in oral sex with another prisoner, was a \public place\ within the meaning of the public sexual indecency statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).