State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Beans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mere fact that statute may be applied unconstitutionally need not result in facial unconstitutionality
• holding that \possession of marijuana by adults at home for personal use is constitutionally protected\
• holding that \possession of marijuana by adults at home for personal use is constitutionally protected\
• holding that similar statutory scheme does not violate equal protection because the payment agreements are tailored to the obligor’s individual needs
• holding that similar Alaska statute does not unduly burden obligor’s ability to earn a living because as soon as obligor enters into a payment agreement, state must reinstate obligor’s license
• holding child support obligor's equal protection rights were not violated by statute allowing suspension of license for failure to pay child support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).