State Department of Human Services v. Gouvitsa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the action of the circuit court was void where the juvenile court retained exclusive jurisdiction over the children
• holding that the action of a court is void when another court had exclusive jurisdiction
• “This issue was decided in Tennessee in [Marmino] and subsequently has been followed by all appellate courts of this state.”
• “This issue was decided in Tennessee in [Marmino] and subsequently has been followed by all appellate courts of this state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).