· 11/17/1995
State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. Meyer
Citations
- 906 P.2d 1365
- 1995 Alas. LEXIS 133
- 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the existence of discrimination is a factual question that cannot be resolved without a hearing
- involving investigation and potential ASCHR administrative action against Department of Fish and Game
- noting compulsory language of Commission’s statutory mandate and observing while there might be valid reasons for the Commission staff to have the power to dismiss cases with individual merit but no widespread impact, the legislature would have to authorize that discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.