Skip to main content
· 11/17/1995

State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. Meyer

Citations

  • 906 P.2d 1365
  • 1995 Alas. LEXIS 133
  • 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the existence of discrimination is a factual question that cannot be resolved without a hearing
  • involving investigation and potential ASCHR administrative action against Department of Fish and Game
  • noting compulsory language of Commission’s statutory mandate and observing while there might be valid reasons for the Commission staff to have the power to dismiss cases with individual merit but no widespread impact, the legislature would have to authorize that discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.