Skip to main content
· 4/16/2010

State, Department of Corrections v. Anthoney

Citations

  • 229 P.3d 164
  • 2010 Alas. LEXIS 41
  • 2010 WL 1529393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing whether it is improper for courts to count claims and determining that court did not abuse its discretion when designating as prevailing a party who won on only a few claims
  • noting courts should not count claims to determine prevailing party status
  • “Even a plaintiff who recovers on only one claim may be designated the prevailing party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Carpeneti, Christen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.