State Department of Children's Services v. A.M.H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge to the authority of a special judge was waived despite the party’s argument that the issue “[went] to . . . jurisdiction”
• explaining that terminating mother’s rights would allow children’s integration into a stable and permanent environment through adoption
• acknowledging, but rejecting Mother‟s argument the challenge to the appointment of the special master involves a question of subject matter jurisdiction that can be raised at any time
• “Mother did not appeal on the grounds that [the juvenile judge‟s] absence was unnecessary or that the paperwork concerning [the special judge‟s] appointment was improper or lacking; thus, these issues are deemed waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).