Skip to main content
· 4/9/1998

State Contracting v. Dept. of Transp.

Citations

  • 709 So. 2d 607
  • 1998 WL 161227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an agency need not defer to an administrative law judge on issues of law under Chapter 120
  • In contrast, the agency is not required to defer to the administrative law judge on issues of law.
  • “In this context [a bid protest before a state agency], the phrase “de novo hearing” is used to describe a form of intra-agency review. The judge may receive evidence ... but the object of the proceeding is to evaluate the action taken by the agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.