· 7/12/1976
State Commission on Human Relations v. Amecom Division of Litton Systems, Inc.
Citations
- 360 A.2d 1
- 278 Md. 120
- 1976 Md. LEXIS 614
- 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 11,168
- 27 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 606
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that if “the statute affects only procedures or remedies, it will be given retroactive application”
- implying that retroactive application of an anti-discrimination statute would mean applying the statute to acts of discrimination which occurred before the statutory effective date
- implying that retroactive application of an anti-discrimination statute would mean applying the statute to acts of discrimination which occurred before the statutory effective date
- defining a retroactive statute as “one which purports to determine the legal significance of acts or events that have occurred prior to the statute’s effective date”
- “Generally, remedial statutes are those which provide a remedy, or improve or facilitate remedies already existing for the enforcement of rights and the redress of injuries.”
- “[W]here prospective application of a law is inconsistent with the nature and purpose of the legislation, retroactive effect will be given.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.