Skip to main content
· 7/12/1976

State Commission on Human Relations v. Amecom Division of Litton Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 360 A.2d 1
  • 278 Md. 120
  • 1976 Md. LEXIS 614
  • 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 11,168
  • 27 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that if “the statute affects only procedures or remedies, it will be given retroactive application”
  • implying that retroactive application of an anti-discrimination statute would mean applying the statute to acts of discrimination which occurred before the statutory effective date
  • implying that retroactive application of an anti-discrimination statute would mean applying the statute to acts of discrimination which occurred before the statutory effective date
  • defining a retroactive statute as “one which purports to determine the legal significance of acts or events that have occurred prior to the statute’s effective date”
  • “Generally, remedial statutes are those which provide a remedy, or improve or facilitate remedies already existing for the enforcement of rights and the redress of injuries.”
  • “[W]here prospective application of a law is inconsistent with the nature and purpose of the legislation, retroactive effect will be given.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.