State, Commission for Human Rights v. Town of Johnston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 113 See id. 114 See R. Doc. No. 37, at 6. 115 See supra Part III(a)(1), (2), and Part III(c)(1
• holding that when ruling on a Rule 12(b)(1) motion, the court must “accept the complaint’s well-pleaded factual allegations as true”
• explaining that a dismissal based on sovereign immunity must be without prejudice
• reversing district court’s dismissal with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after finding the defendant was entitled to sovereign immunity
• reversing a district court’s order dismissing a case barred by sovereign immunity with prejudice
• “Our precedents also make clear that a jurisdictional dismissal must be without prejudice to refiling in a forum of competent jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).