Skip to main content
· 12/3/1996

State, Central Collection v. Dld Associates Ltd. P'ship

Citations

  • 685 A.2d 873
  • 112 Md. App. 502
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to allow appellant to invoke doctrine of laches against State when State acted in governmental capacity
  • analyzing whether Injured Workers Insurance Fund is an instrumentality of the State for purposes of sovereign immunity
  • referring to L&E § 9-301 as a statute designed “to express the desire of the Legislature to have an agency or instrumentality act independently of other units of government”
  • State need not enjoy complete control over an entity in order for that entity to be considered an instrumentality or agency of the State
  • General Assembly's failure to designate an entity that is \independent of all State units\ as an agency or instrumentality of the State does not preclude a finding that the entity is an agency or instrumentality of the State
  • analyzing applicability of sovereign immunity to Injured Workers' Insurance Fund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Wenner and Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.