State Capital Insurance v. Mutual Assurance Society

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two excess clauses are “in irreconcilable conflict with one another”
• court accepts, but does not explicitly state, that the insurer of the owner of the vehicle, as opposed to the insurer of the driver, is the primary insurer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).