Skip to main content
· 10/31/1997

STATE BY HUMPHREY v. Granite Gate Resorts

Citations

  • 568 N.W.2d 715
  • 1997 WL 557670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that nonresident defendants cannot claim inconvenience as an excuse to avoid personal jurisdiction, particularly since Minnesota has an interest in regulating advertisements
  • acknowledging that radio and television advertisements confer jurisdiction and equating internet advertisements similar thereto
  • acknowledging that a Minnesota consumer investigator dialed nonresident defendant’s toll-free phone number
  • noting this factor alone cannot confer jurisdiction, but it can support jurisdiction in light of the other three factors
  • “A defendant cannot hide behind the structuring of its distribution system when the defendant's intent was to enter the market in the forum state and profit thereby.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis, Crippen, Harten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.