Skip to main content
· 12/18/1981

State, by Atty. Gen. v. Pioneer Mill Co.

Citations

  • 637 P.2d 1131
  • 64 Haw. 168
  • 1981 Haw. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding evidence of the probability of a future redesignation of property for other than agricultural or single family resident use admissible for determination of value in eminent domain proceedings
  • postjudgment interest on blight of summons damages is interest on interest and § 101-33 contains no authority for the award
  • “Experts’ opinions vary and the competence, credibility and weight of their testimony is. exclusively in the province of the [trier of fact].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Lum, Nakamura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.