State Board of Medical Examiners v. McCroskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that ultimate findings “involve a conclusion of law, or at least a mixed question of law and fact”
• after-the-fact 4 Case: 20-30229 Document: 00515922429 Page: 5 Date Filed: 07/01/2021 No. 20-30229 testimony that the patient “would not have taken [the drug at issue] had she been advised of this risk…would be, at best, self-serving, speculative, and, of course, subjective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).