Skip to main content
· 9/21/1971

State Board of Higher Education v. First Methodist Church

Citations

  • 488 P.2d 835
  • 6 Or. App. 492
  • 1971 Ore. App. LEXIS 735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing that “substitute facility” approach but rejecting it where neither of those requirements was met
  • explaining that “substitution” or cost of reproduction can be an appropriate measure of fair market value when the condemned property performs “a legally necessary function”
  • doctrine inapplicable to condemnation of church youth center
  • doctrine inapplicable to condemnation of church youth center

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Langtry, Foley, Fort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.