· 9/21/1971
State Board of Higher Education v. First Methodist Church
Citations
- 488 P.2d 835
- 6 Or. App. 492
- 1971 Ore. App. LEXIS 735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing that “substitute facility” approach but rejecting it where neither of those requirements was met
- explaining that “substitution” or cost of reproduction can be an appropriate measure of fair market value when the condemned property performs “a legally necessary function”
- doctrine inapplicable to condemnation of church youth center
- doctrine inapplicable to condemnation of church youth center
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Langtry, Foley, Fort
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.