Skip to main content
· 2/10/1989

State, Bd. of Optometry v. FLA. SOC. OF OPHTH.

Citations

  • 538 So. 2d 878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an equal protection violation where the juvenile defendant, due to his indigency, could not accept the State’s offer to nolle prosse his case upon payment of restitution, as done for his co-defendant, subjecting him to trial, adjudication, and commitment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zehmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.