Skip to main content
· 2/2/1994

State Bar of Texas v. Kilpatrick

Citations

  • 874 S.W.2d 656
  • 1994 WL 27170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial amendment -adding new cause of ac tion was not prejudicial on its face because it involved the same subject matter and trial court could have reasonably believed that the trial amendment did not impair defendant’s ability to present defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.