Skip to main content
· 11/25/1986

State Bar of Ga. v. Beazley

Citations

  • 350 S.E.2d 422
  • 256 Ga. 561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affording preclusive effect under res judicata to federal court rejection of claim that earlier state court judgment was void for want of jurisdiction
  • affording preclusive effect under res judicata to federal court rejection of claim that earlier state court judgment was void for want of jurisdiction
  • “The term ‘party’ to an action includes all who are directly interested in the subject matter, and who have a right to make defense, control the pleadings, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and appeal from the judgment.”
  • State Bar considered party for res judicata purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Marshall, Clarke, Smith, Weltner, Hunt, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.