State Bank v. Noland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the ABCMR should have an opportunity to evaluate plaintiffs evidence, all of which should have been previously included in the record”
• “To the extent that evidence may not have been — or, in fact, was not — considered below by the [administrative agency], the ‘proper course ... is to remand to the agency for additional investigation or explanation.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).