State Bank v. Martin
Citations
- 52 La. Ann. 1628
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. Where the disposition or proposed disposition of produce from farm or factory is in the usual course of business — i. e., to commission merchants from whom advances had been procured and a pledge antecedently given, no grounds for attachment appear.</p> <p>2. An attachment based upon the averment of a fraudulent disposition, or proposed disposition of property or unfair preference, must be supported by proof of some act or declaration of purpose from which the fraudulent intent of the debtor may reasonably be gathered.</p> <p>3. If the credit and good fame of the debtor have been lessened and the same is attributable rather to his own conduct than to the act of his creditor in attaching his property, small grounds for damages exist.</p> <p>4. Under the circumstances of this ease, while the attachment is dissolved, damages, except for attorney's fees and actual expenses, are disallowed.</p>
Judges: Blanchard, Breaux, Takes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.