State Bank v. Hayes
Citations
- 16 S.D. 365
- 92 N.W. 1068
- 1902 S.D. LEXIS 121
Syllabus
<p>I. Where a debtor executed to his creditor a note for a sum exceeding the debt, and received the creditor’s note for the amount of such excess, the note given by such debtor was not an accommodation note, hut was for a full consideration.</p> <p>2. Under Comp. Laws, g 3442, providing that “a non-negotiable written contract for the payment of money may be transferred by indorsement in like manner with negotiable instruments, * * * subject to all equities and defenses existing in favor of the maker at the time of the indorsement,” a right of action for breach of contract accruing to the maker of a nonnegotiable note against the payee, three years after the note was transferred by indorsement constitutes no defense to a suit by the indorsee to recover on the note.</p>
Judges: Corson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.