State Bank v. Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying transfer of a pro se litigant’s case to district court because none of his alleged constitutional claims had any chance of being remedied
• in turn citing Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9, 101 S.Ct. 173, 66 L.Ed.2d 163 (1980); Taylor v. United States, 303 F.3d 1357, 1359 (Fed.Cir.2002)
• citingTaylor v. United States,303 F.3d 1357, 1359 (Fed. Cir.2002)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).