State Bank v. Epstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the majority of appellate cases . . . tend to indicate an accused’s presence and explicit refusal to consent is ‘constitutionally insignificant,’ so long as the consenting cotenant has equal access or control over the premises to be searched”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).