State Bank v. Cassels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the outcry statute found in the Family Code should be interpreted and applied in a juvenile trial in the same manner as the parallel rule in the Code of Criminal Procedure is applied in an adult criminal trial
• “defendant in this case had the burden to introduce evidence that J.M.’s statement to his mother was more than just a general allusion to abuse”
• outcry statute recognizes “the necessity of introducing the child’s statements through an adult witness . . . .”
• “defendant in this case had the burden to introduce evidence that J.M.’s statement to his mother was more than just a general allusion to abuse”
• ―defendant in this case had the burden to introduce evidence that J.M.‘s statement to his mother was more than just a general allusion to abuse‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).