· 4/5/2006
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kingsport Development, LLC
Citations
- 364 Ill. App. 3d 946
- 846 N.E.2d 974
- 301 Ill. Dec. 371
- 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding to the trial court to determine whether the State Auto policy applied on a primary or excess basis
- remanding to the trial court to determine whether the State Auto policy applied on a primary or excess basis
- remanding to the trial court to resolve the issue of indemnification
- finding Kammerling inapposite and a seven-month delay in seeking a declaratory judgment reasonable because the underlying action was still ongoing at the time of filing and because the insurer consistently denied having a duty to defend the insured
- remanding to the trial court to resolve the issue of indemnification
- finding Kammerling inapposite and a seven-month delay in seeking a declaratory judgment reasonable because the underlying action was still ongoing at the time of filing and because the insurer - 20 - 2014 IL App (2d) 131058 consistently denied having a duty to defend the insured
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.