Skip to main content
· 4/5/2006

State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kingsport Development, LLC

Citations

  • 364 Ill. App. 3d 946
  • 846 N.E.2d 974
  • 301 Ill. Dec. 371
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to the trial court to determine whether the State Auto policy applied on a primary or excess basis
  • remanding to the trial court to determine whether the State Auto policy applied on a primary or excess basis
  • remanding to the trial court to resolve the issue of indemnification
  • finding Kammerling inapposite and a seven-month delay in seeking a declaratory judgment reasonable because the underlying action was still ongoing at the time of filing and because the insurer consistently denied having a duty to defend the insured
  • remanding to the trial court to resolve the issue of indemnification
  • finding Kammerling inapposite and a seven-month delay in seeking a declaratory judgment reasonable because the underlying action was still ongoing at the time of filing and because the insurer - 20 - 2014 IL App (2d) 131058 consistently denied having a duty to defend the insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.