State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters by Automobile Underwriters v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee is not an “insured” under a poHcy that specifies employer as insured and had as the purpose of the coverage to protect employer from Hability
• noting when an insurance policy is susceptible to two interpretations, one that sustains coverage and one that does not, Iowa courts favor the construction that provides coverage
• noting “[t]he burden is on appellant to demonstrate error” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).