Stasey v. Stasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[t]his section of our statutes provides the only reason or excuse for tolling or extending the time within which suit must be filed” under the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anaya v. City of Santa Fe
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-03-03· cited 23×
• Schultz v. Pojoaque Tribal Police Department
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-04-11· cited 19×
• Owens v. Eddie Lu's Fine Apparel
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-10-16· cited 11×
• Howie v. Stevens
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-05-08· cited 8×
• Rodriguez v. X-Pert Well Service, Inc.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-05-31· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1943-10-19· cited 71×
• Wilson v. New Mexico Lumber & Timber Co.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-06-27· cited 34×
• Swallows v. City of Albuquerque
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-06-27· cited 32×
• State Ex Rel. Kermac Nuclear Fuels Corp. v. Larrazolo
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-10-05· cited 21×
• Garcia v. New Mexico State Highway Department
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-05-01· cited 20×
• Taylor v. Am. Employers' Ins. Co. of Boston, Mass.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1931-08-13· cited 18×
• Maestas v. American Metal Co.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1933-03-06· cited 15×
• Caton v. Gilliland Oil Co.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1928-02-02· cited 11×
• Lucero v. White Auto Stores, Inc.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-12-03· cited 10×
• Edinburg v. Southwestern Public Service Co.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1933-02-28· cited 5×
• Mumford v. State Highway Commission
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1931-05-07· cited 4×