Stas v. Posada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appellant had no ownership rights in the property and thus lacked standing, as she was not affected by the judgment below
• appellant with no ownership interest in property was not affected by order and thus precluded from seeking appellate review
• “Appellant Juan Mueller was not a party below and made no effort to intervene in the action. Consequently, he ... is precluded from seeking appellate review.”
• “Appellant . . . was not a party below and made no 5 effort to intervene in the action. Consequently, he too is precluded from seeking appellate review.”
• noting appellant did not have ownership interest in property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).