Starrh and Starrh Cotton Growers v. Aera Energy LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's oil production activities that caused contaminated water to migrate into plaintiffs land could feasibly be reduced or discontinued and were therefore continuous in nature
• finding that the issue of whether trespass generally is continuing or permanent was a question of fact for the jury
• finding “no record evidence” to support the jury’s award of restoration costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).