Starrett v. Commercial Bank of Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Notwithstanding the ultimate purpose of the agreement, individual contract provisions may be intended to benefit a stranger to the contract, thus creating a third-party beneficiary.”
• appellant enumerated the grant of summary judgment as error but only made conclusory statements and failed to present argument or citation to authority
• A third-party beneficiary contract is “one in which the promisor engages to the promisee to render some performance to a third person.”
• the face of a settlement agreement within a divorce decree showed the parties’ intent to make a bank a beneficiary, where the agreement specifically required the payment of one party’s loan with the bank, identifying the bank by name and the loan by its outstanding balance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).